The question that psychological, natal astrology has failed to answer, for all its perceived advantages, is why an individual might have an inner experience in one place rather than another. Yet ninety-nine percent of twentieth century western astrology has focused on the inner journey rather than the outer experience. Medieval horoscopy retained the allocation of houses to different places, and horary astrology has preserved the link between the four angles and the cardinal directions. Ptolemy rationalised and simplified the Babylonian model, inventing a crude system in which the twelve zodiac signs corresponded to twelve regions and peoples. The Babylonians, armed with this knowledge, believed that it was possible to ascertain the region in which an omen's significance would be experienced. When we turn to astrology itself, we find that the Babylonian astrologers were deeply concerned with such questions as the direction in which a celestial omen was observed, the part of the sky in which it took place, or the quadrant of the Moon which was obscured during an eclipse. And that this concern was once widespread is demonstrated in the evidence provided by the modern historical disciplines of archaeo-astronomy and ethno-astronomy. The beliefs of the architects and builders responsible for these monuments indicate a concern with space that equals that with time. The placing and construction of sacred sites from Megalithic circles to Egyptian, Greek, Mesoamerican and Hindu temples, reflect a concern with both the universe's metaphysical structure and observations of horizon phenomena. But apart from this, spatial questions scarcely ever make an appearance in contemporary astrology. Students of astrology are taught that the three items of data required for the calculation of any horoscope are time, date and place, and those concerned with astrology's advanced technicalities argue the pros and cons of different house systems, yet for these purposes space is treated as neutral, as a means merely of working out the ascendant and midheaven. But, we may ask, whatever happened to space? Jung had nothing to say about the quality of the place at which an event happens, at least not in relation to astrology. TIME AND SPACE IN ASTROLOGY An Introductory Comment by Nicholas Campion President of The Astrological Association of Great Britain Jung's oft-quoted dictum that 'whatever is born or done at this moment of time, has the quality of this moment of time" is, perhaps, the presiding manifesto of modern astrology.